Page 1 2 3 4 5 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Do you participate in Round Dancing? Login/Join
 
Championship
Location: Earth
Registered:: 08-06-2000
Posts: 2458
posted   Reply With QuoteReport This Post  
We are interested in feedback from dancers who participate in "Round Dancing", particularly how people first became interested in this dance form, what they enjoy about it, and whether they feel it is continuing to grow in popularity around the world. Information about the history of Round Dancing would also be of interest.

If you are a Round Dancer (or have other friends who are Round Dancers, please forward this message on to them), and post your comments here!

[ 12-04-2001: Message edited by: DanceScape ]

Championship
Location: Boston area
Registered:: 03-10-2001
Posts: 1533
posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteReport This Post  
When I read your request for information about round dancing I wasn't sure what type you were referring to since I've encountered dances referred to as round dances in various places. After consulting with my resident expert, I figured I'd take a stab at giving some history.

According to Vernon and Irene Castle (ca 1914):
"Years ago dances were divided into two groups, the 'Round' and the 'Square.' The latter were usually danced by a number of couples arranged in the form of a square, and the various movements were 'called out' by the leader of the orchestra.... 'Round' dances comprised the Waltz, the Polka, the Yorke, and the Schottische, the Varsuvienne, and the Gallop. Practically none of these dances is seen nowadays. For this we are duly thankful..."

Despite the Castles' distain for these round dances they survived within certain sectors of the dance community. In the late 1930's, Lloyd Shaw wrote a book called "Cowboy Dances" in which he describes traditional round and square dances as they were done by oldtimers in the western US.

In the 1930's Lloyd Shaw also organized a group of students from the Cheyenne Mountain High School to perform the traditional squares and round dances locally. This group grew in popularity and became a national sensation. Eventually the round dances became more elaborate for performance purposes and began to involve specific choreographies.

Following WWII both square and round dancing gained in popularity as a burst of patriotism increased interest in all things American. In 1948 Shaw wrote "The Round Dance Book" which takes the traditional round dances and flavors them with the ballroom dancing then popular.

Lloyd Shaw is today remembered as the father of Modern Western Square Dancing and of Modern Round Dancing. Considering his influence, the title is well deserved.




<Betsy & Chuck Berry>
posted   Reply With QuoteReport This Post  
Thank you for taking interest in this branch of dancing, which some of us prefer to call "Choreographed Ballroom" (in contrast to Freestyle or Social Ballroom Dance). We have found that if we use the term "Round Dancing", most people imagine folk dancing in a big circle. No matter how much we tell them that we dance Ballroom rhythms and figures, the "Hokey Pokey" image sticks in people's minds.

We ourselves started Rounds after we burned out on Square Dancing. In the past, this is probably the path most people took. Nowadays, social ballroom seems much healthier and nearly all the dancers who have gotten into Rounds in our area over the past few years were originally Freestyle Ballroom or social dancers. All of us still do both Freestyle and Choreographed.

Many of us were first attracted to Round Dancing because of the more consistent figure names and definitions, and the choreographic elements which necessarily become obvious from the beginning. Granted, most of the names and definitions originated in Ballroom, but typical Ballroom teachers in our experience don't rely on them heavily, and consulting various video and written sources reveals much disagreement. In Round Dancing, on the other hand, knowing the figure names and how to do them is critical, and thus is emphasized.

Those of us with "checklist mentalities" are also addicted to working our way up through the structure (each figure and dance is formally assigned a Phase, from 1 to 6), and motivated to learn dances we now have to sit out due to lack of knowledge.

Freestyle Ballroom is nice because we can work on whichever figures we want to, and we HAVE TO practice leading and following. Yet even in Round Dancing, leading and following are important. The man doesn't make up the choreography, but CAN alter the timing slightly, the amount of turn, the arm work, etc. And it is important (more fun and nicer appearing) to dance TOGETHER rather than each dancing independently to the cues. Freestyle Ballroom helps us keep this in mind.

We like Round Dancing because during a 3-minute dance, we HAVE TO at least TRY 20 or 30 different figures. When doing Freestyle, we find we get in ruts, doing over and over simple figures we are already comfortable with; when Round Dancing we're forced to stretch and learn and practice to improve our weaknesses.

And on an "easy" dance we already know, we have a great opportunity to work on our technique and on staying connected rather than concentrating on creating what may be poor choreography and following what may be ambiguous leads.

It can be a long and boring night for the follower (usually the woman) in such situations. Whether she is stuck all night with one bad partner or a series of different ones, following poor leads and trying to hold up a weak frame can make for a frustrating evening. At a Round Dance, the woman can do her part and work on her own technique and still be intellectually challenged and enjoy the dance, even if her partner is struggling to maintain the rhythm.

A woman with a "good partner" (when both already know a particular dance) is free to relax as she performs it and can appreciate how well the choreography fits the music rather than staying attuned to her partner's leads.

And no matter what our abilities, when Round Dancing we don't spend nearly as much energy navigating around a too-crowded floor full of couples moving in different directions.

On a given night, we typically dance many more rhythms in Round Dancing than in Freestyle Ballroom. While this may not be true of all Freestyle situations, most of our local bands play mostly what they call "Fox Trots" but which really seem to be slow One-Steps to ballad-type music the singer enjoys singing. Some music they play we find difficult to dance ANY steps to. There are usually a few (too few) Waltzes, Cha Chas, Tangos, and almost never any Paso Doble, Bolero, Argentine Tango, West Coast Swing, etc. Of course, some people enjoy dancing to a live band, something we never have in Round Dancing.

But although it's merely recorded music (or rather, BECAUSE it is) the music for Rounds tends to be more appropriate for dancing than is the case at Freestyle dances. The musicians who play at our Freestyle clubs are in general not dancers themselves, may not really know one rhythm from another, tend to fill their music with random tempo changes and false endings, and do other things while playing which might be fun for them performing, or for people who are merely listening, but which we find frustrating to dance to.

The music we Round Dance to, on the other hand, is selected because it is danceable. If strict tempo is violated, the choreographer has incorporated a dip or picture figure which fits the music and is dramatic and fun to do.

Even in the introduction, the bridges, and the ending, the dance fits the music; this only happens by random coincidence when we dance Freestyle. After having so much pre-planned "success" in fitting the steps to the music in Rounds, a leader (usually the man) can be frustrated when he rarely accomplishes nice matches when leading Freestyle, and may tend to spend undue energy trying for such fits. On the other hand, when he CAN occasionally out-guess the band about when a piece of music is going to end and pulls of a perfect fit with his on-the-fly choreography, it can admittedly be quite a thrill! The follower can also get frustrated (often more so, because she is so helpless) at "missed opportunities" for great figures.

In Rounds as opposed to Freestyle, there seems to be more emphasis on the dancing itself rather than on costumes, hairstyles, lavish meals, etc. And there tends to be much less emphasis on alcohol, and smoking is seldom allowed. We personally favor this emphasis on the dancing itself, though others would disagree - - it is admittedly less romantic to dance in a school gym than at a formal ballroom or a country club.

Another major factor in favor of Round Dancing is the cost. Our local dances are $5.00 per couple for a 3-hour session, and people who attend two such sessions in the same week don't have to pay for the second. We recently returned from a week of Round Dancing, Sunday night through Saturday night, a total of 18 sessions, during which people learned as many as 16 new dances; had small-group Clinics on figures and technique; and many hours of "party dancing" to choreography we already know (or got up and TRIED to do "to cues" even if we'd never heard the particular dance before). The week was run by four couples, including some of the major teachers and choreographers in the hobby. The dance fee was just $90.00 per couple for the week, something like a buck an hour per person! The fact that these leaders were there primarily to celebrate their love of the hobby and to share this fun (rather than to make money) came through in their enthusiasm and made the week all the more enjoyable.

One final thing we like about Round Dancing is that it allows the partners more equality (this may appeal more to women) since there is less emphasis on leading/following and since the choreography is not determined by either of the partners. Women who find it irritating to be constantly doing what the man wants (especially when she hears a different rhythm or has a different style), may find Round Dancing a great compromise.

Wow! You must have hit a nerve! This got l-o-n-g, didn't it!

You might also try to attend a nearby Round Dance event in person. We could help you locate one. A fabulous opportunity would be at the Universal Round Dance Council ("URDC") Convention in San Jose from July 26 to 29. This is one of the year's greatest concentrations of talent (dancers as well as teachers from around the world) of the year.

Betsy & Chuck Berry

PreBronze
Location: Boise, Idaho, USA
Registered:: 06-10-2001
Posts: 13
posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteReport This Post  
My partner/husband and I met at Ballroom Dance Class in our teens. He later became a Square Dance caller X 30 years and when I saw Round dancing...WOW! I was sold!
We started learning 18 and teaching 16 years ago. We are members of Roundalab - web site <roundalab.org> and find that we can learn more amalgamations of advanced figures in Round Dancing than most Ballroom studios would ever teach you unless you first achieve Bronze ->Silver-> Gold status. The roundalab site lists 'cue sheets' for Classic Dances in Phases I-VI that are presently danced all over the world.
We enjoy Round Dancing socially, and find the cost=$5 - $10/couple/3 hours of instruction and dancing to be the best bargain on the planet!
International figures in all the Dancesport rhythms Plus Mambo, Salsa, WCS, Shag, Lindy, Merengue, Slow Two step=Niteclub and Square dancer's Two Step, Bolero and new this year - Hustle.
The Berry's complete description of how the Choreography fits the music, and how perfect the tempo is to dance to as well as the avoidance of having to lead while thinking what to do next on your feet and freestyle ballroom collisions pretty well sums up the reasons we love Round dancing.
The floor appears to be doing Dancesport Formation dancing as all couples are doing the same figures simultaneously.
The amalgamations used in Round dance routines are applicable to competition, but most Rounddancers prefer to dance socially. We also dance freestyle Ballroom at least once a month with USABDA. Many of the ballroom dancers are now taking Round Dance Lessons.
For information on finding a Rounddance Instructor in all 50 states and most foreign countries - call 1-877-YI DANCE.
Robin & Bob Young, in Boise, Idaho.

[This message has been edited by rdcuer@qwest.net (edited 06-11-2001).]




PreBronze
Location: Boise, Idaho, USA
Registered:: 06-10-2001
Posts: 13
posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteReport This Post  
As requested, here is a sample 'Head Cues' Sheet of figures for a complete dance:
BODY & SOUL (music)
TULLUS (Choreog)Seq: AB AC AB AC speed(44) (VI) FOXTROT

INTRO
CP Fc DW
WAIT - - WHISK - FEATHER -
"A"
REV WAVE - CK & WEAVE - - 3 STEP - HOVER X - - OPEN TELEMARK - FEATHER -
"B"
CHG DIRECTION - CONTRA CK & SWITCH - CURVE FEATHER - BK FEATHER - FEATHER FINISH - LEFT FEATHER - - FEATHER FIN -
"A"
REV WAVE - CK & WEAVE - - 3 STEP - HOVER X - - OPEN TELEMARK - FEATHER -
"C"
WHISK - DEVELOPE - LINK SCP - WEAVE 4 & SLIP - - OPEN TELEMARK -
THRU TO OVERSWAY - RONDE & SLIP - (SECOND TIME THROWAWAY)
REPEAT DANCE
ENDING
SLOW RISE & X LINE -

Head Cues are abbreviated 'prompts to the dancers, voiced with the music about a measure and a half ahead of the figure.'
The complete cue sheet has step by step instructions. Cue Sheets are a 'suggestion' of the figures to 'do' to a certain piece of music and allow for individual stylization or a change when a new similar figure is taught.

Championship
Location: Earth
Registered:: 08-06-2000
Posts: 2458
posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteReport This Post  
Thanks so much for these latest postings and background information!

Would anyone have a video that they can send to us - we would love to be able to show a clip of Round Dancing so that others can visually see what it's all about!

Please explain how you interpret the Cue Sheet -- are these all standardized, or can they be created by any experienced round dancer? Also, are these the same steps as defined for the Ballroom Syllabus, or do you have your own Syllabus that may have adaptations of the Ballroom Technique/Syllabus.

Please continue to educate all of us on this wonderful dance form!




PreBronze
Location: Boise, Idaho, USA
Registered:: 06-10-2001
Posts: 13
posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteReport This Post  
Here is a complete cue sheet with the Head Cues in CAPS...Some dancers memorize complete dances!
TEQUILA
PHASE VI MAMBO ROTHER-Choreographers of WA Dancers' cue-sheet by A. Woodruff in Belgium

INTRO

Both facing Center, Shadow position (left hands joined). Both L foot free. There is no intro. We start with the third measure of Part A (1/4 Diamond Turn).

PART A

DIAMOND TURN 3/4 WITH HOPS
Starts Tandem, facing wall, left hands joined. Ends facing Reverse.
BACK BASIC
NO hop!
STEP FLICK POINT
Both: step side on L turning 1/4 RF to face Center, flick R foot behind to a "4", swivel RF on L foot to end
facing diagonal Reverse/Wall and point R foot to side,-; (QQS)
FORWARD TURN SIT
Both: Forward R turning LF to face Line, recover L continuing to turn LF to face diagonal Reverse/Center,
back R to a "sit" with both knees bent and hands down with palms turned forward,-;. (QQS)
BODY RIPPLE
Tuck tommy in as if someone had punched you in the stomach, then slowly "unfold" bringing right hand up, palm turned out. (4 beats)
TRANSITION FAN
Man: Rock forward, recover, rock foward, recover. (QQQQ)
Lady: normal fan. Now in fan position, man facing center.
ALTERNATING HOCKEY STICKS
4 QQS measures
1) The first 3 steps will set up the position to prepare the action.
Lady's steps: Preparation
Man's steps: 1/2 basic turning LF to face Reverse.
At the end, both raise joined hands to form window and join left hands at waist level. (Ladies, keep your right elbow forward, not side)
2) Lady goes: forward L, forward R turning 1/2 LF under joined hands, back L,-;
Man: Back basic turning 1/2 RF.
On beat 1, pull with R hand to help lady go. On beat 2 release R hand (lady's left), on beat 3 join R hand (lady's left) to form new window, man's elbow forward. Other hands now joined at waist level,-;
3) Man goes: forward L, forward R turning 1/2 LF under joined hands, back L,-;
Lady: Back basic turning 1/2 RF.
On beat 1, pull with R hand to help man go. On beat 2 release R hand (man's left), on beat 3 join R hand (man's left) to form new window, lady's elbow forward. Other hands now joined at waist level,-.
4) Same as measure (2) except do not form new window. Ends in Left Open facing man facing Line.
NEW YORKER
SWIVEL 3
NEW YORKER
SPOT TURN

PART B
ARM CHECK
Both: Rock apart, recover, forward, - getting lady's right shoulder close to man' s left shoulder.
On last beat, join both hands close together (Jerry Pierce's choice) OR, according to cue-sheet, man takes lady's left wrist in his right hand.
Then : man gives lady a (gentle) push into her spin as he steps forward turning 1/2 LF, recover, close, -.
Lady spins 1 1/2 RF t end facing man.

HALF BASIC
Join lead hands and do a forward basic turning 1/8 to end with the man facing diagonal Reverse/Center.
NATURAL TOP 7, RONDE
The whole figure turns about 1 full turn. Ends facing Center.
Timing: QQS, QQQQ
Man: behind, side, behind, - (7, 11, 7)
side, behind, close, side and immediately extend L foot to side to start ronde to semi (facing Reverse)
Lady: side, front, side, - (11, 7, 11)
front, side, front, side and immediately extend R foot to side to start ronde to semi (facing
Reverse)
BACK POINT, KICK POINT, KICK
2 measures; the swivels are omitted in timing below (replaced by "-")
Man: Step back on L and quickly point R to Line, - (QS)
Kick R across and point R to Line, - (QS)
Kick R across, - (S)
Lady: Step back on R and quickly point L to Line, - (QS)
Kick L across and point L to Line, - (QS)
Kick L across, - (S)
THRU FACE CLOSE
SQQ
HALF BASIC
WHIP TO LOP
BACK BASIC
PATTY CAKE TAP
As in Mambo 5
BACK BASIC
PATTY CAKE TAP
BACK BASIC
SPOT TURN

PART C
ARM CHECK TO TANDEM
As in "ARM CHECK" above but man turns one full turn to end facing wall, lady behind him.
DO-SI-DO WITH KICKS, LADY TRANSITIONS
Man: Front, side, back with lift, kick R to side
Behind, side, forward with lift, kick L to side
Front, side, back with lift, kick R to side
Behind, side, forward
Lady: Behind, side, forward with lift, kick L to side
Front, side, back with lift, kick R to side
Behind, side, forward with lift, kick L to side
Front, side, TOUCH
Clue: Cross in front if you are in front, cross behind if you are behind. We go once and a half time around each other.
Ends Tandem wall, man behind lady.
FORWARD BASIC KICK
Both: Forward L, recover R, back L, kick R foot forward
SIT AND RIPPLE
Both: Back R to a "sit" with both knees bent. Body ripple.

PART D
HALF BASIC
CROSS BODY TO CLOSED
Closed, man facing Reverse, lead hands down and slightly back.
RUN 2 POINT
Move joined hands forward, back, forward.
Run like kiki walks: step in front of other foot.
POINT AND SIT
Man: point L back with joined hands moving back, -
point L forward and sit on R leg, moving joined hands forward, -
Lady: point R forward
step back R to "sit" (both knees bent).
BODY RIPPLE
FAN TRANSITION
Man: rock back, recover to face wall, touch!
Lady: normal fan.
ALEMANA

ENDING
BACK BASIC TO CENTER
Semi
RUN 3
Lady swivel run 3.
PATTY CAKE TAP
BACK BASIC
PATTY CAKE TAP
BACK BASIC TO OPEN
WRAP TRANSITION
Man: Close L, -, back R, -
Lady: Wrap in 3
BODY RIPPLE

SEQUENCE: INTRO, A (3-16), B, C, A, D, C, A, Ending

Notes on some positions:
Skaters: Side by side, left hands joined, mans right hand on ladys waist, lady? right hand extended to side.
Skirt skaters: same but lady holds skirt.
Varsouvienne: same but both hands joined: L/L, R/R.
Shadow: Mans right hip is directly BEHIND ladys left hip. Left hands joined, free hands extended to side.
Tandem: One partner directly behind the other.

Championship
Registered:: 12-19-2000
Posts: 1328
posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteReport This Post  
Thanks everyone for the information! My partner's private ballroom coach is an experienced round dance cuer and an award-winning round dance choreographer. I never really had any inkling of what that meant until today. More info please!!!!!

Laura




<Chuck Berry>
posted   Reply With QuoteReport This Post  
I (Chuck) am not very computer literate - - it's all I can do to write even a little e note like this. Betsy is tied up with something else, but will take a look and get back to you when she gets a chance.

The choreographer of each dance writes a "Cue Sheet" and distributes it freely so that others (cuers/dancers) who are interested can cue/teach/learn the dance. Many records ordered from Palomino or other record services include cue sheets automatically. At higher levels, teachers usually give copies of cue sheets to dancers when they teach the dance so the dancers can practice on their own.

Typically, there is only one dance written to a given piece of music. However, sometimes a choreographer (or two different choreographers) will write dances at two different levels to the same piece of music.

And if a dance "dies" (doesn't become popular, or disappears from popularity and is not done much for several years) the same piece of music may be resurrected with different choreography. In nearly all such cases, the dances will have have two different names to avoid confusion.

The cue sheet tells (or should tell, though some don't quite do an adequate job of it) everything one needs to know to do the dance. There are "Head Cues" which are the words the cuer says, and are all that the dancers hear when they perform the dance. There are in most cases also "Step Cues" which tell in detail the man's and lady's footwork (which direction they step, how far they turn, what the timing of each step is, etc.).

Sometimes there's a fine line between these, particularly in the case of higher phase dances. There simply isn't time for the cuer to say everything necessary to explain the dance, in the case of modified versions of normal figures, unusual facing directions, etc. To have success with a hard dance, the dancers must already "know" it well, and if they don't remember a tricky spot, will appreciate the cuer reminding them of some of the critical portions of the step cues in addition to the normal head cues (if he/she has time to do so).

But most of us have as a goal to cue and to dance with the minimum of "talking" to interrupt the music. In fact, some dancers memorize favorite dances and do the whole thing without cues. This is a wonderful idea for just a few dances, but most of us find it impossible for more than a handful, and must rely on cues for hundreds or thousands of others.

Also, some dances containing standard figures are referred to as "Cue and Do" dances. Dancers who know all the figures can have great success dancing them for the first time without a teach.

If you'd like examples of some cue sheets, we could certainly send you some. There are some places on the Web which post cue sheets, though in many cases there are only Head Cues and no Step Cues.

In general, what people wear wouldn't be considered a "costume", though on the Saturday night session of a weekend, or for performing a Demo for the benefit of everyone else in attendance, some people may put on pretty exotic clothes. But in most cases it's pretty casual. And we've seldom if ever seen the feathers and weird eye shadow and open leather vests which are often worn by Competitive Ballroom Dancers.

At the week-long event we mentioned before, I wore shorts and a short sleeve shirt to all the daytime sessions, as I tend to be too hot by nature. At night, I still wore a short sleeve shirt, but put on a tie a couple of nights to try to match whatever color Betsy was wearing. She, on the other hand, tends to be cold, and wore mostly pants and even a sweater during the day, but put on skirts or dresses at night. As we mentioned in our last note, we are much more interested in the dancing itself than in "costumes". We don't want awkward (or expensive!) clothes to take away from our comfort and our ability to enjoy a hobby we are doing for fun, and I think we're typical.

Hope this helps. We'd love more questions if you have them.

Championship
Location: Boston area
Registered:: 03-10-2001
Posts: 1533
posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteReport This Post  
Wow, this is interesting. I had never heard of round dancing outside the folk dance scene until Dacescape brought this up. My husband's familiar with it, but even after we went over the history and such I was still thinking it was more a square/country dance thing than ballroom.

So these choreographies are done to specific pieces of music, right? That would get around my complaint about ballroom competition choreographies, that they have to be homogonized to fit whatever standardized piece of music comes on. Sounds like these would be able to highlight the phrasing and tempo of a piece and still leave room for improvisation. Am I understanding this correctly? Sounds like fun!




  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5  
 


Copyright 1998-2014, danceScape Corporation. All rights reserved.

click here for RSS feed click here for RSS feed
DANCESCAPE & SKYHICLUB HOTLINE:
Tel: +1 (905) 633-8808 E-mail: info@dancescape.com