Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | ![]() |
PreBronze Location: Redmond, Wa, USA Registered:: 03-05-2001 Posts: 13 | I started as a Western dancer, then to WCS, then to ballroom with some Argentine tango. I am amazed at the different personalities that are attracted to each type of dance. The Western dancers are mostly laid back and don't take many lessons especially in technique but they are fun loving people. The WCS people are also fun loving, party people but they are more interested in learning. The ballroom and tango groups are mostly professional people (since they are the only ones that afford the lessons!) that are focused on technique. The interesting thing I find is that people may bounce between Western and Swing or Swing and Ballroom but Tango is almost exclusive. I like them all and, depending on my mood, I do the different dances. When people realize that I have a range of dance knowledge, they are surprised indicating that people should only be into one-two forms of dance. That's too limiting for me. Tango and WCS are the most creative for the woman I think. They allow the follow to embellish or syncopate without waiting to be lead. That's fun to do at times. Isn't great that we have all these dance venues to chose from! |
Silver Location: san jose, ca Registered:: 01-26-2001 Posts: 374 | So, on why the ballroom world might look down on CW: I have my own story. The only CW performers I've seen did a show at a college Ballroom competition. They were supposably a top CW couple and they performed two nights in a row. and the general consensus from the crowd by the end was that country western was for people with big smiles, cowboy outfits and not a lot of dance technique. So I guess if you came up to someone who's only experience was that show and said you're a competitive country western dancer, they'd probably look down their nose at you.. Which is not fair, but I doubt it's an isolated incident. You win and lose respect one show at a time. |
PreBronze Location: Little Rock, AR, USA Registered:: 06-28-2001 Posts: 51 | I have to weigh in here because I've been actively competing in both ballroom (pro-am) and country (am/am) for 2 years and have attended enough comps in both styles to know what I'm talking about. A great deal of the misperception that country western dancers aren't good dancers comes from ignorance or lack of exposure to high level country western dancing. Like a previous poster said, there are many not-so-good dancers in both ballroom and country that are hyped as being much better than they actually are. But anyone who believes that country western dancers have no technique is all wet. My amateur partner and I just competed last weekend in the New Orleans Mardi Gras Country Dance comp, one of the biggest & best in the country. As usual, I saw some absolutely incredible dancing as well as some very mediocre dancing. I defy the average ballroom dancer (or even the above-average one) to duplicate the intricacies of the turn and spin technique of an "average" CW dancer. Turning, spinning and spotting are emphasized in CW because you have to do lots of it in 2-step, the classic CW dance. My turn and spin technique has actually deteriorated since I've been doing mostly ballroom, because there is no ballroom or latin dance that is comparable to 2-step in terms of the demands made on the lady to turn and spin multiple times, with clean feet and remaining standing and smiling and looking balanced. But that's not the only area in which country dancers excel. Competitive country dancers are taught "open" routines for their first competition and showmanship and presentation is emphasized from day one in their training. In fact, this aspect of country vs. ballroom is probably the one I have in the past taken issue with most, that is, that country western training seems to emphasize flashy moves over solid technique in the early stages of dancing. However, I believe that as the student progresses, the country western dancer ends up looking more at ease and "better" on the dance floor than many ballroom students because the CW student becomes accustomed to doing long, complex routines in the early days of their dancing. It does seem to be a "backwards" approach. In ballroom, a student would never be given "open" material while he or she is still learning basics. But I've found that the CW dancers with good instruction end up having good body movement, turn technique, and partnering skills after about two years of hard work. About the same time it takes a ballroom student to "look good." I love both styles. If I had to give one up, it would be country. But I would encourage anyone who thinks country dancers can't really dance to attend a competition like the Mardi Gras before making pronouncements out of ignorance. JLyn |
Silver Location: Tucson, Arizona Registered:: 07-02-2001 Posts: 454 | Now, I have not noticed this in my locale; the ballroom world being critical of C&W. I do ballroom actively and it was in C&W that I got my start into dancing. |
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|